5 ways to design and develop a world class research facility

It’s no secret that quality and cutting edge research is a defining characteristic of Australia’s Universities. And while state-of-the-art infrastructure has long been recognised as the engine fuelling research development, the fast pace of innovation is driving increased competition in this area.

As a result, many universities are focusing on how to leverage partnerships and new technology to design, construct, operate and maintain innovative and flexible research facilities.

But what actually makes a research facility ‘innovative? And more importantly, what strategies can universities use to avoid mistakes in planning and development stages to ensure they create a collaborative, flexible and leading facility for the future?

Ahead of the 4th Annual Research Facilities Design and Development Summit, here are 5 strategies Universities can use to design and develop flexible research facilities for the future.

Below, influencers from La Trobe University, Woods Bagot, Southern Cross University, The University of Adelaide and the German Max Planck Institute share the strategies they are each using in their own research facility projects to ensure project success.

1. Set a clear vision

Jussi Helppi, Head of Biomedical Services – Speaker of Facilities & Services, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (MPI-CBG) (Germany)

“Designing the Institute’s facilities wasn’t much of a struggle. We were lucky to have right architects (Heikkinen & Komonen, together with HENN Architects) for the building, where the directors basically had the luxury of finding who understood what we wanted to do before they even started drawing the schematics.

While the architects focused on the architecture, the interior laboratory planning was mostly done – in close collaboration with the scientists – by another company based here in Germany: Dr Heinekamp Labor und Institutsplanung. The building was finished in early 2001.

As in every planning process, there were challenges to manage. Our building was financed mostly by the Max Planck Society, but as the future users of the building we, the institute, managed at the end to maintain good control of the process. Although the balancing act between us (the users), the central building headquarters of the Society in Munich, and the planners and architects was not always easy, at the end we got the building built according to our ideas and visions.

The main reason for our success in the building process was the clear mandate our founding directors gave the architects – to provide a building on the highest level in technical and practical terms in laboratory design that also promotes synergy, cooperation and community. Thus, the institute’s building has been carefully designed to force scientists to come together, to create the critical mass necessary for new discoveries.

2. Consider future adaptability and expansion

Russell Hoye, Pro Vice Chancellor of Research and Director of La Trobe Sport, at La Trobe University

“Located on 60 hectares in the southwest corner of the La Trobe University campus in Bundoora, the Sports Park will provide a unique environment for play, performance training, teaching and research in sport.

The Sports Park initial designs will include an eight-court indoor multisport stadium for netball and basketball. Other infrastructure planned to be built include a strength and conditioning training facility, teaching and research space, synthetic hockey and football pitches and upgrades to existing ovals and pavilions.All these facilities will be available for community use – for teaching and coaching purposes,” says Russell.

As part of La Trobe University’s Master Plan 2014 the Sports Park has been designed with a flexible base infrastructure that allows for multidisciplinary collaboration and future expansion. With the University Town Neighbourhoods Master Plan in place we’re future-proofing our investment by designing the Sports Park’s physical layout to allow for future expansion and room to include more pitches.

Additionally, we’ve worked with architects and engineers who have identified underlying infrastructure requirements, so as new application and technologies are developed over time, we can simply plug that into our base infrastructure without needing to do additional core work – the sports facility has a very flexible base infrastructure making it suitable for multiple uses and adaptable for future technologies.”

Download the remainder of the article here 


Join industry representatives at the 4th Annual Research Facilities Design and Development Summit to learn more about how to:

  • Address innovation regarding the best designs for research facilities
  • Analyse construction strategies to boost operational efficacy Review the development of facilities to maximise space utilisation
  • Provide you with the best management advices to prevent a loss in ROI

For more information visit https://researchfacilities.iqpc.com.au or
call +61 2 9229 1000 or email enquire@iqpc.com.au


How one team overcame design and construction challenges to create a cutting edge research facility

Earlier this year we spoke with Dr Ian Garthwaite, Laboratory Services Manager – Research at The Charles Perkins Centre, about the design and technological elements that make Sydney University’s $385 million purpose-built research facility ‘world-class.’

In the interview, Ian revealed a change to the procurement method from a traditional to a design and construct methodology, meant the facility had to be designed and documented as it was being built via a fast-track process.

This not only bought about a unique set of challenges for architecture practice FJMT (in association with Building Studio) and the contractor Brookfield Multiplex, but it also meant the client and project team had to work very closely together to ensure the vision of creating a leading research facility was delivered.

In order to uncover the specific strategies the project team used to overcome major design and build challenges to deliver a leading research facility, we asked Matthew Todd, Principal at Hassell (formally a Principal at FJMT) to shed some light on his experience in designing and buikding the Charles Perkins Centre…

Project objectives: meeting the client brief

The main objective of the research component of the project was to  facilitate cross-disciplinary interaction between various groups within the university. That was  the over-arching goal of the brief.  We had to meet and deliver that vision to the  University of Sydney.

This is a unique project in the sense that it originated from a traditional design and documentation process undertaken by Hassell. However, following the University’s appointment of the contractor Brookfield Multiplex (BMPX), an alternate fast-track D&C procurement methodology was pursued to ensure the project was delivered on time and budget. FJMT (in association with Building Studio) was the architect on BMPX’s team.

The core of the BMPX alternate proposal was an entire building redesign. There was already a lot of great work done by Hassell on the earlier version of the building, and we came along and re-examined the brief. We had a six month window before BMPX started construction. We had to go back to the basics of the brief and run a huge number of meetings and workshops to ensure we were all on the same page and that the vision of our client would be met with a new building design. These meetings needed to be time efficient yet effective because as the facility was being designed, it was being built.

The 50,000 square metre project was designed, documented and constructed in two years – a testament to the skills and commitment of the entire project team.

The importance of stakeholder engagement

It goes without saying that collaboration and engagement with stakeholders is critical to the success of any large scale project. Regular meetings, workshops and presentations all played an important role in engaging everyone involved.

But from a design perspective, our other strategy was full-scale and extensive prototyping. This is something that doesn’t always happen as much as it should, but it’s a really important process which enables the user to physically see and interact with the full-scale vision.

We created a variety of prototypes in an offsite location that included a portion of the research lab module, workplace (an office, workstations, hot desks) and informal meeting area.  Users were invited to visit and provide feedback on the prototypes.


Charles Perkins Centre Exterior

It was a great process which resulted in numerous refinements as we fine-tuned the design, details, materials and finishes based on direct feedback of the prototypes.. This iterative process was

especially critical due to the PC2 certification sought for the research labs as the little details are really important!

Key elements of design

In relation to the research components of the building, the key design elements were driven by a desire for clarity and legibility of the building for occupants. Despite the scale, this was achieved by a deliberately straight-forward layout of the research labs, workplaces and informal meeting and interaction spaces all surrounding a distinctive atrium.

As the symbolic heart of the building, the top-lit atrium gathers all the primary circulation elements (stairs, lifts) and interaction spaces to capture the energy of the occupants and facilitate informal meetings between different groups. The design of the varying curved atrium edge and locations of vertical circulation enables clear views between, and across, the floors right into the research laboratories.



On another level, our flexible and modular approach to the research laboratory design was fundamental to the design. Loose, yet modular, lab benches and mobile under bench cabinets are inherently reconfigurable by occupants – essential if the spaces are to react to the specific research requirements of each group. Likewise, services spines suspended from the ceiling are able to accommodate increased power, data and gas supply densities as needs arise.

Design challenges

There were a series of challenges affecting the design that we faced during the project, which were often interrelated. The construction timetable was a challenge – due to the fast-track process it was difficult to know when and how packages were being procured as changes were frequent.

Because of the proximity of the facility to St Johns College and the age of the campus itself, heritage was another key challenge. We had to ensure that the design of the Charles Perkins Centre integrated well with the surrounding buildings and campus.

Due to our programme milestones, we needed planning approval within a short timeframe to enable construction to continue.  We managed to do so through proactive engagement and staging of the planning submissions with the City of Sydney and the Department of Planning and Infrastructure.

Another challenge was the integration of technology. Technology, in particular audio visual, is constantly changing from the time you commence a project to when it is installed on site. So it was important for us to be able to get the latest and greatest technology into the facility, particularly for the 240 person teaching lab, known as the X-lab, which was a key to the success of the spaces.

Lessons Learned

There are always a lot of lessons from projects of this nature and scale but the main takeaway for me would be to ensure genuine collaboration between all parties involved. I’ve worked on a number of projects over the last 20 odd years and it has reinforced the fact that if everyone is together on the same page, you will deliver better outcomes.

Often there are problems when expectations within the team are quite different. That is when friction occurs. So it’s important to ensure you’re openly collaborating with each other at all stages of the project.

Another lesson we learnt is that starting with a thorough client brief is key to success. The clarity of the brief (prepared by Liz Partridge) helped us to ensure that expectations were aligned and that we delivered what the client was seeking.

Forecasting for the future

Matthew: Over time things always change in university buildings, but particularly in research labs. Obviously there are different research groups that come and go, and they need to be able to expand and contract depending on their size and the nature of the space.

The university did all the background work to understand the users’ needs and how they might change in the future. They then briefed us quite extensively and on the probable requirements for future allowances to services and spaces.

Charles Perkins Centre Day One of teaching 6 February 2014

Research and teaching spaces enhanced by technology

This was a really important process in terms of forecasting what space allocations we would need to make and helped us to future proof, particularly for new or additional services. It was a similar case with the technology. To anticipate and accommodate future change we designed flexible mobile benching and made allowances for the occupants to be able to insert new fume cupboards in the building for example.

But probably the most important tool for future proofing was taking the brief from the client and then translating that into a BIM model. The integration and power of BIM is really useful not only in terms of design, coordination and construction of research facilities but for facility management in the future.

Matthew Todd and Dr Ian Garthwaite and will be further exploring the lessons learned from the highly collaborative environment designed and fostered at the Charles Perkins Centre at Research Facilities Design and Development 2015.

For more information download the brochure here or visit www.researchfacilities.com.au 

How Monash University is attracting world-class researchers & dollars through collaboration and strategic partnerships

Times are changing for the higher education sector in Australia. Due to budget cuts and increasing international competition, many universities are recognising the importance of developing state of the art research facilities in order to attract funding opportunities, more students and world-class researchers into the future.

In order to achieve this, the design, construction, operation and maintenance of innovative research facilities is critical.

Monash University is one institution who knows what it takes to design and develop world-class research facilities in order to attract more dollars for their business.

With a net research income of 314 million dollars at the end of 2014, Monash topped the NHMRC funding across Australia last year and continues to partner with external providers such as Pfizer and Siemens in order to attract leading researchers globally.

Ahead of Research Facility Design and Development 2015, Julie Rothacker, Director, Platform Operations and Strategy, Vice-Provost Office of Research and Research Infrastructure at Monash, explores the strategies the university is using to align research needs with design and construction of their facilities, and how other universities can avoid mistakes in planning and development phases to deliver functional and sustainable research facilities.

Overview: Monash’s research facilities at a glance

Monash is home to 24 technology research facilities and currently employs over 3500 academic researchers. The University has developed a coordinated infrastructure strategy which is centrally supported and aligned with the University’s overall research strategy in order to utilise equipment to its full capacity.

The main objective is to ensure we are able to provide world-class research facilities to our researchers, collaborators and industry. In doing so, we have built facilities with peak instrumentation, often unique to Australia.  We have lifted the instrumentation out of the schools and departments to coordinate and manage effectively in a platform facility. This ensures there is no duplication with equipment, an ability to produce clear efficiency gains and that our equipment is well maintained and not under-utilised.

Over the years, there has been a significant investment by Monash, local and Federal governments and philanthropic organisations to build a suite of high-end technology research platforms. Due to this level of investment and commitment by external funding agencies to support Monash University we must ensure we’re getting the best use out of our infrastructure and equipment and that these facilities are easily accessible.

One way we are achieving this is by developing a platform strategy which revolves around setting up core facilities, each with their own dedicated manager, clear KPI’s and governance structures.

The 24 technology research platforms are available for researchers from both academia and industry. Putting a manager in charge of each platform allows additional operational support and ensures equipment is well maintained and used to its full potential.

The research facilities vary from supporting research in the drug discovery pipeline, advanced manufacturing, sustainability or medtech. For example: genomics, aerodynamic measurements in a wind tunnel, 3D printing, protein crystallisation or 3D visualization to name a few.

Partnering with internal and external players to attract more research dollars

At Monash the technology research platforms are underpinning key internal and external research collaborations where the design and construction of our facilities is critical to ensure the best performance of our technology. The Pfizer Centre for Therapeutic Innovations is a unique model for building academic and industry collaboration and has developed due to the researchers being able to be innovative and compete on the international stage.

By being part of this collaboration, we’re allowing researchers to answer that big question or develop their research to a point where companies can commercialise it and look into translating it into new medicines or innovative outcomes.

The role the research facility plays is to provide the equipment and technology needed to enable researchers to answer big questions, and eventually partner and collaborate with big organisations like Pfizer.

One of our main aims is to ensure we are giving our researchers the latest technology which meets their needs and it’s a big factor in how we develop our research facilities.

Another example of where we partner externally to build our facilities is through a big focus on technology. We have a number of examples where we have developed strategic partnerships with companies such as Siemens, Perkin Elmer, Tecan or FEI.

As part of these partnerships we don’t focus on getting the cheapest equipment but rather at building long term partnerships which will help us not only build capacity, but also provide a win for the company we’re partnering with.

Another important element of developing strategic partnerships is involving the researchers in the process. At Monash we encourage researchers to push the development of the technology, so we can go to a certain company and work with them to develop technology based on interesting research questions.

The great thing about strategic partnerships is the ability to work with external companies on research technology development, and often as a result our partners will help us always have the latest technology available to ensure our researchers stay at the cutting edge.

Monash has also recently joined the Victorian Platform Technology Network’s initiative, the Australian Research Infrastructure Network (ARIN) which is an online instrument and services booking software.  Ensuring these platform facilities are easily accessible by academic researchers and industry customers is critical for the success and development of our research facilities. The benefit is being able to show key stakeholders that anyone can access our research platforms which will ensure our customers can ultimately achieve great research outcomes, impact and improved societal behaviours.

The differentiator for the ARIN is the ability to integrate all technology research platforms across institutions in Victoria. By implementing ARIN widely across Monash, a researcher from any research organisation or industry can access our equipment from one login. They also have the ability to access infrastructure from other Victorian research organisations like CSIRO, RMIT and Swinburne. This has enormous impact because it’s getting the whole industry involved in research, but also providing opportunities for collaboration with other universities and partners which helps deliver greater impact to the community.

Download the full article here to read more about how Monash is:

  • Procuring the right tech and putting the researchers’ needs first
  • Avoiding mistakes in planning and design to build functional and flexible facilities
  • attracting world-class researchers

For more information about Research Facilities Design and Development 2015, visit www.researchfacilities.com.au or call +61 2 9229 1000 or email enquire@iqpc.com.au